Considering user message options

I see the user posted a Chinese sentence about Ulreich, mentioning he hasn't decided on retirement yet and will agree with the club next year. This sounds like it could be news, but they didn’t ask a question. I think it’s best to clarify what they need. Should I ask if they want a translation, summary, context, or something else? Hmm, I could also provide some background on Sven Ulreich as the Bayern Munich goalkeeper for more depth.Avoiding misinformation about current events

I need to be careful not to create any false information about current events since my knowledge cuts off in October 2024, and now it's December 2025. The user shared a headline, which suggests they might want a translation or more information. It makes sense to ask them directly what they're interested in: a translation to English, background on Ulreich, possible implications for Bayern's goalkeeper depth, or a brief news-style rewrite. I'll make sure to keep my response concise and clear!Creating a concise response

I could definitely write a brief summary about the user’s message regarding Bayern goalkeeper Sven Ulreich. First, I should start with a one-line translation, and then give some context by mentioning his status as Bayern’s backup keeper and how his statement suggests that a decision about retirement is postponed until 2025. After that, I could offer some options for the user: 1) just the English translation, 2) his background and contract status as of 2024, and others. Keeping it clear and concise will be key!